| Why do so many Christian bookstores refuse to carry
popular author Dave Hunt’s book, "What Love is This?" Well,
the subtitle gives a clue: "Calvinism’s Misrepresentation of
God." One doesn’t come against a major portion of Protestant
Christianity without running into trouble.
Hunt has dared to scrutinize Reformed theology without couching it in
terminology one would need a divinity degree to understand. Prior to the
release of this 2002 book published by Loyal Publishing, other books
have been published critical of Calvinism, but most were geared toward
other theologians, not meant for a general Christian readership.
Although the book is user-friendly it is still filled with deep
thoughts. It really can’t be sped-read. It’s too profound. It will
have the reader thinking and digging deeper into the Word. Hunt debunks
long-held ideas that many Christians have just assumed to be true but
have never bothered to question the origins of those traditions.
The cover of the book quotes best-selling author Tim LaHaye as saying
that "This may well be the most important book written in the
twenty-first century." We have another 97 years to see whether that’s
true or not, but if the bookstores continue to suppress it, its impact
will be somewhat limited.
Hunt characterizes Calvinism as a system that sees God as the master
puppeteer pulling the strings of humanity. People are merely robots
programmed by their Creator to be either sinners or saints with no
free-will to choose good or evil. "Calvinists have made God the
effective cause of every event that occurs," Hunt writes (pg. 126).
All that happens throughout history, even the fall of man in the Garden
of Eden, happened because God has so willed it. Hunt says that makes God
the source of sin.
"This continual emphasis upon God’s sovereignty to the
exclusion of His love, mercy and grace dominates the thinking of
Calvinists," Hunt asserts (pg. 213). And the author assures the
reader that "care is being taken to be certain that Calvinism is
fairly presented and clearly understood in order not to charge
Calvinists falsely" (pg. 317).
The book takes apart the systematized theology of T-U-L-I-P, an
acronym used to represent the five points of Calvinism. Hunt writes,
"We consider TULIP to be a libel against our loving and merciful
God as He reveals himself both in His Word and in human conscience"
(pg. 304). Most Calvinists would see these as fighting words.
Hunt describes what Calvinists mean by each of the
letters in TULIP and spends about two chapters per letter examining the
beliefs against the Word of God. He quotes many Calvinist writers --
both modern and historical -- and tests their claims against Scripture.
The Who’s Who of Calvinists he cites are such highly respected names
that some readers may be reluctant to go along with him. They include
Arthur Pink, D. James Kennedy, Charles Spurgeon, Jonathan Edwards,
Robert Morey, B. B. Warfield, R. C. Sproul, John MacArthur, Jay Adams,
J. I. Packer and of course John Calvin.
Some of Hunt’s objections to the five points of
Calvinism include the following:
 | T - TOTAL DEPRAVITY --"Calvinism offers a special
definition of human depravity: that depravity equals inability"
(pg. 92). "A cardinal point of Reformed theology is the maxim,
‘Regeneration precedes faith.’ . . . There is not one scripture
which states clearly the doctrine that regeneration comes first and
then faith follows -- not one" (pg. 95). "To believe the
gospel and to receive Christ requires no work or worth on man’s
part, contributes nothing to his salvation, gives no credit to man
and detracts in no way from God’s glory" (pg. 121). |
 | U - UNCONDITIONAL ELECTION -- "Why did Calvin’s God
choose to save so few when He could have saved all? . . . James
White informs us . . . ‘It is according to the kind intention of
His will.’ So it is God’s kindness that causes Him to save so
few and to damn so many! We are aghast at such a concept, and we are
offended on behalf of our God" (pg. 198) |
 | L - LIMITED ATONEMENT -- "Calvinists contend that ‘It
makes no sense for Christ to offer atonement for those the Father
does not entrust to Him for salvation.’ This is human reasoning
without even one verse of Scripture to support it" (pg. 250).
"Christ did not die for individual sins only, but for sin
itself -- a penalty which had to be paid in order for anyone to be
saved" (pg. 251). |
 | I - IRRESISTIBLE GRACE -- "Forcing even a most
valuable and desirable gift upon someone who dose not wish to
receive it would be ungracious in the extreme. Thus the phrase ‘irresistible
grace’ is another oxymoron" (pg. 294). "Surely the
continual disobedience both of unbelievers and believers proves that
God’s grace is not ‘irresistible" . . . freedom of choice
itself is part of God’s plan!" (pg. 299). |
 | P - PERSEVERANCE OF THE SAINTS -- "Uncertainty as to
one’s ultimate salvation is, in fact, built into the very fabric
of their system" (pg. 378). "One’s performance could be
excellent most of one’s life, but if failure comes at some point,
one has lost the performance-based assurance" "pg. 381).
"If being one of the elect is the basis for assurance of
salvation, then there can be no assurance" (pg. 412). |
Since Hunt believes in the doctrine of eternal security, he does not
take issue with the idea of "once saved, always saved." It
might have made the book more interesting if he had shown the Arminian
arguments for the teaching that true believers can apostatize from the
faith. Instead, he turns the argument into an issue over the assurance
of the believer in the last point of TULIP.
Before the book was published Hunt sent copies of his manuscript to
several Calvinists for their input. Many told him he was not qualified
to evaluate Calvinism. "Calvinists insist that it requires special
. . . preparation for anyone to become qualified to examine that
peculiar doctrine in light of the Bible, " Hunt noted and asks
"Why?" "If special expertise were required to test
Calvinism against Scripture, surely that would be proof in itself that
this peculiar doctrine did not come from valid biblical exegesis.
Anything that enigmatic, by very definition, could not have been derived
from the Bible, which itself claims to be written for the simple"
(pg. 26).
If Hunt, a Christian author of over 20 books, is not qualified to
test the claims of Calvinism by Scripture, then the average Christian
sure can’t either and I guess we’re supposed to believe it on the
word of the academically qualified seminary graduates.
"What Love is This?" could easily be labeled as divisive.
But that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be read and the arguments weighed
and examined by thinking Christians. Hunt asks an important question,
"if Calvinism is true Christianity, would that mean that
non-Calvinists are not Christians?" (pg. 19). If Calvinists make
that claim, then they’re the ones causing the division.
No staunch Calvinist can read this book without being offended. You
don’t label a person’s belief system as false and unloving without
getting a negative reaction. And Hunt’s treatment of the Reformer John
Calvin, a man revered by all Calvinists, is perhaps the most
controversial element of this book.
Hunt refers to Calvin as the "Protestant Pope" and
documents that Calvin wrote his major theological treatise
"Institutes of the Christian Religion" while a new convert
from Catholicism and only one-year-old in the Lord. He shows Calvin’s
source of doctrine as coming from St. Augustine, the so-called doctor of
the Roman Catholic Church. Hunt calls Calvinism an "unbiblical
system of religion devised by an immature believer and then dogmatically
upheld not only by him but by his followers today" (pg. 305).
In chapter five, Hunt gives a history lesson of John Calvin’s
state-church system in Geneva, Switzerland where non-Calvinists were
tortured and burned at the stake if they disagreed with Calvin’s
theology. Hunt notes that "Calvin is defended with the plea that
such dealings were common practice and that he should be judged by the
standard of his time. Do Calvin’s defenders really mean that ‘new
creatures in Christ Jesus’ are to rise no higher than the conventions
of their culture and moment in history?" (pg. 71)
If this book whets the appetite of Christians who are studying the
Bible to decide for themselves what side to align with, the book Hunt is
now working on should help quite a bit. Hunt and Reformed theologian
James White are putting their arguments in writing so that both sides of
the debate can be fairly presented. The Calvinism debate book is
expected to be released sometime in the fall of 2003 by Multnomah Press.
In the next Update we hope to report on the response "What Love
is This?" is receiving in Calvinist circles and examine the claims
of the critics.
|